Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/End time bible prophecy

End time bible prophecy
Hi. This is my first 'real vfd. I know quite a bit about this area as it examines the idea that future events can be discovered in the pages of the Bible - specifically the book of Revelation. The reasons why I wish to delete this article are as follows:
 * 1. It is not an examination of different points of view. It is asserting one particular point of view.
 * 2. It is didactic and therefore POV.
 * 3. The different theories of End-time prophecy are found in Dispensationalism, Christian eschatology, Millennialism, End times, Last judgment, Second Coming, Rapture, Book of Revelation, Tribulation, Antichrist, Apocalypse, End of the world, Parousia and Number of the Beast (numerology).
 * One Salient Oversight 14:09, 24 Sep 2004 (UTC)


 * Delete, redirect to Christian eschatology, or rework completely: make it about the various attempts to read the events of the times in light of biblical prophecies (which are innumerable) rather than a presentation of one reading of those prophecies. &#8212;No-One Jones (m) 14:15, 24 Sep 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete and redirect. Pyrrhos 16:01, 24 Sep 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. What a lousy article! Goes beyond POV into propoganda. --Improv 16:21, 24 Sep 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. Redirect Christian eschatology. DJ Clayworth 16:38, 24 Sep 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete: redirect to Christian eschatology. Coincidentally, I sat down and read Revelation of Saint John start to finish for only the second time just yesterday.  Seems to be about Nero, not the future.  Not that that's relevant. Geogre 17:20, 24 Sep 2004 (UTC)
 * It seems too POV even for a redirect. Delete. Redirect. Spatch 17:35, 24 Sep 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete content. The job is done better at Christian eschatology, save the title for a redirect, I suppose. Fire Star 18:17, 24 Sep 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. RickK 19:04, Sep 24, 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. Original research otherwise known as "personal seances with the Book to see what evil spirit comes into the room."   I tried very hard to twist the standards to keep some of this rant somewhere, but I failed.  In my opinion, there is nothing here worth saving--not even the redirect.  ---Rednblu 19:49, 24 Sep 2004 (UTC)
 * Yeah, I'm afraid you're right. End times is a better redirect than this. Fire Star 20:48, 24 Sep 2004 (UTC)


 * Delete. Over-the-top POV/propaganda.  Maybe a bit of original conjecture, if not outright original research.  Someone's been spending a little too much time picking the Book of Revelations apart.  :^) - Lucky 6.9 20:18, 24 Sep 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete and redirect, either to Christian eschatology or to end times; the latter may relate more directly to this content. Smerdis of Tlön 20:50, 24 Sep 2004 (UTC)


 * Delete and redirect. Jayjg 20:58, 24 Sep 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. I don't think a redirect would be helpful. If someone does look this up, they are likely to capitalize "Bible". [[User:Aranel|Aranel ("Sarah")]] 00:14, 25 Sep 2004 (UTC)
 * Redirect. -Sean Curtin 01:37, Sep 25, 2004 (UTC)
 * Redirect.   &mdash; Gwalla | Talk 01:48, 25 Sep 2004 (UTC)
 * Redirect -- Netoholic @ 06:53, 2004 Sep 25 (UTC)
 * Delete and create a redirect. [[User:Poccil|Peter O. (Talk)]] 22:21, Sep 25, 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete, no redirect. Wile E. Heresiarch 14:29, 26 Sep 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. Not sure there's much point in keeping it as a redirect. --G Rutter 14:50, 26 Sep 2004 (UTC)
 * Redirect and (NPOV &) salvage content. Yes there is some, even after I've edited quite a lot of it away (and more could go).  Rich Farmbrough 21:37, 27 Sep 2004 (UTC)
 * As usual, no need to delete. Just redirect. Mark Richards 06:50, 28 Sep 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete, not encyclopedic, unfortunately :-( Kim Bruning 19:37, 28 Sep 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. Ambi 09:19, 30 Sep 2004 (UTC)