Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Endangered Species (2003 film)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Stifle (talk) 14:33, 24 November 2021 (UTC)

Endangered Species (2003 film)

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Fails WP:NFO and WP:NFSOURCES; found no reviews on Rotten Tomatoes and nothing else was found on a WP:BEFORE search. The Film Creator (talk) 20:16, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science fiction and fantasy-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:31, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:31, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep Review found at Dread Central (a WP:RS)  Donald D23   talk to me  20:33, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
 * @User:Donaldd23 Good. All you need to find is one more significant and reliable source or review and I will withdraw the nomination. The Film Creator (talk) 20:44, 31 October 2021 (UTC)


 * Can you count Actionfreunde as reliable, for instance? It's listed among 12 external reviews on IMDB. Google finds the same 12 reviews. The film might have caught somewhat on in Germany, under the name Gejagt (Hunted). Cf. this tv writeup and other sources, is the real release year 2002 and not 2003? Geschichte (talk) 23:21, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
 * I’m not sure if those reviews come from reliable sources, but if consensus disagrees I’d be glad to withdraw the nomination. The Film Creator (talk) 12:25, 1 November 2021 (UTC)
 * To be clear, I think that at least some of the 12 reviews are non-RS, but a couple of them might be. Geschichte (talk) 13:05, 1 November 2021 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  23:57, 7 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete - nothing. Very weak review sources and nothing else. None of them seem particularly reliable - in fact, all of them look like any producer could pay the website to have a review put up. Fred Zepelin (talk) 07:29, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Dread Central is a reliable source and reviews in reliable sources are the main means of achieving notability for films, imv Atlantic306 (talk) 04:06, 13 November 2021 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 03:04, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep per reviews in Dread Central, Actionfreunde and I also remember that Somethingawful has been used for review notability before. Geschichte (talk) 13:31, 22 November 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.