Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Endian Firewall


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 15:39, 27 August 2012 (UTC)

Endian Firewall

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

Article fails WP:NOTABILITY. Seems to be nothing more than Self-promotion and product placement, which wikipedia is WP:NOT Hu12 (talk) 17:43, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. 19:33, 13 August 2012 (UTC)  • Gene93k (talk) 19:33, 13 August 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete: all I can find is a stream of routine announcements, seemingly reprints of company's press releases. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk) 19:34, 16 August 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep and improve: Endian is one of the most polished and well developed network management and security suite "distros" much like vyatta and ClearOS. I am strongly opposed to its deletion because of poor contribution now. I am willing to hound for community reviews and sources.
 * —-— .: Seth_Nimbosa :. (talk • contribs) 05:46, 18 August 2012 (UTC)
 * May be you could also name the sources that could be used for improving it? — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk) 09:40, 18 August 2012 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  TheSpecialUser TSU 00:43, 20 August 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete: I found only trivial mentions in Google Books. SL93 (talk) 19:56, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.