Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Endless Adventures


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Cirt (talk) 13:41, 5 February 2009 (UTC)

Endless Adventures

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable game. Article does not assert notability. Rnb (talk) 15:37, 31 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Endless Adventures LARP "IS" a notable game. I am an avid LARP enthusiast and enjoy playing Endless Adventures, a game that rivals european LARP groups. I positively hope this page is not deleted, it would crush the co-creators and players alike. Wikipedia is just one landmark of many to come for Endless Adventures LARP. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.30.124.131 (talk) 16:28, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
 * If the game is notable, verifiable sources should be provided to establish notability. Rnb (talk) 16:31, 31 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Strong Keep - A simple Google search reveals this game is notable. Anti  venin  16:49, 31 January 2009 (UTC)


 * I have had a quick look at [Category Live-action role-playing games] and see that there are several games which seem to be similar to Endless Adventures. Perhaps the problem with Endless Adventures is that it is centred on Kansas City and does not seem to be known elsewhere. But is this a reason for deletion??? - Ipigott (talk) 16:57, 31 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete: Fails WP:N. The google search above doesn't show notability. Schuym1 (talk) 17:05, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete I looked through the first 100 google results on  and was unable to find any sources more significant than forum postings, game listings, and myspace/youtube videos. Significant coverage in independent, reliable sources, please, per WP:N. Maralia (talk) 18:56, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete fails WP:N; no significant coverage by reliable 3rd party sources. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 03:28, 5 February 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.