Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Endless Mic


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 16:09, 15 October 2017 (UTC)

Endless Mic

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:NMUSIC. A somewhat promotional article, being entirely sourced by a band website and their record label -- both primary sources -- does not help make a case of passing WP:GNG. This has been tagged for notability for nine years and I think it is about time we come to a decision on the notability (or lack thereof) of this group. TheGracefulSlick (talk) 07:55, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  M assiveYR   ♠  08:35, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions.  M assiveYR   ♠  08:35, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of North Carolina-related deletion discussions.  M assiveYR   ♠  08:35, 8 October 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete. First of all, poor sourcing in an article has no bearing on notability. You need to follow WP:BEFORE to try to identify any coverage that exists. A quick Google search found these:, , , . Personally I don't feel the coverage that exists is sufficient to justify an article, or that it demonstrates sufficient significance for inclusion. --Michig (talk) 08:43, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete Agree that the sources identified by Michig--plus those I searched for myself--are fairly run-of-the-mill, small time and insignificant. Getting press for the sake of getting press does not equal notability. The article appears to be original research by an SPA editor wishing to promote subjects for which he/she has an interest. TheGracefulSlick, you may want to consider AfD nominating the editor's other articles, which are of similar promotional bent with only small time/insignificant coverage (I'm a bit too "code writing deficient" to know how to do it myself) ShelbyMarion (talk) 21:43, 8 October 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.