Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Endocentric environment


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Liz Read! Talk! 07:05, 28 May 2024 (UTC)

Endocentric environment

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

No refs on the page for many years. No finding sources to show that this term meets the notability standards for inclusion JMWt (talk) 09:39, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. JMWt (talk) 09:39, 21 May 2024 (UTC)


 * Delete I was not able to find any sources that are not simply mirrors of this article. Even if there is demand for information on the term, we obviously need sources to back up the claim of what this term means. Flemmish Nietzsche (talk) 14:36, 21 May 2024 (UTC)


 * Delete I got zero hits in the Ebsco database, zero in G-Books. If this were a thing there would be evidence. (I actually like the term; too bad it didn't get traction.) Lamona (talk) 15:43, 26 May 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.