Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Endpoint Modeling


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  19:12, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Endpoint Modeling

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable company. Does not pass WP:GNG Zpeopleheart (talk) 20:02, 16 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete, fails WP:NCOMPANY and I see no sources besides press releases. Not to be confused with potentially notable term related to statistics which I do see mentioned in books. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 01:41, 17 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. --  Ascii002  ( talk  ·  contribs  ·  guestbook ) 03:13, 17 November 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete - No better notability at this time. SwisterTwister   talk  06:34, 17 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - fairly obvious COI. Deb (talk) 12:16, 17 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Comment - This article purports to be about a technology but it appears that only Observable Networks uses this term. There appears to be only one independent source (mHealthNews). Sbwoodside (talk) 20:45, 18 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete. Essentially an advertisement, on a subject which is a propriety term used by one business for its non-notable product. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 10:46, 19 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - nothing in searches to support notability. 's analysis is spot on.  Onel 5969  TT me 12:22, 24 November 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.