Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Endrendrum Kaadhal


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. per WP:SNOW. Author has been spamming hoaxes. &mdash; Spaceman  Spiff  11:38, 10 July 2012 (UTC)

Endrendrum Kaadhal

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

WP:CRYSTAL applies. Future film being promoted by one of its cast. &mdash; RHaworth (talk · contribs) 09:16, 5 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete – Imaginative film. &mdash; Vensatry (Ping me)  10:20, 5 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 10:29, 5 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 10:29, 5 July 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete per WP:CRYSTAL, once there is something concrete about the movie the article may be justified. Note - article has previously been deleted CSD#A1. Callanecc (talk • contribs) talkback (etc) template appreciated. 10:39, 5 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete Editor 2050 (talk) 12:28, 5 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Why wasn't this speedily deleted. This whole process has just given this idiotic editor to turn up with an IP address and increase his five minutes of fame by adding more nonsense to an already fake article. Editor 2050 (talk) 19:01, 6 July 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete due to lack of references - Anbu121 ( talk me ) 09:01, 6 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete Per WP:CRYSTAL, and for the fact the content is simply, original research. -- MST  ☆  R   (Chat Me!) 08:05, 7 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete. original research. Some bored editor just using his imagination. Johannes003 (talk) 09:18, 7 July 2012 (UTC)
 * No, probably a real movie being promoted by some kid who has got himself a small part in it. &mdash; RHaworth (talk · contribs) 11:36, 7 July 2012 (UTC)
 * I don't know how much you know about Tamil cinema, but not in 100 years such a film would ever materialize! This is not a real film and you will never be able to find even a single source mentioning about this film, simply because it does not exist. The entire article is pure fantasy, fake! You can believe me and all other editors who have commented previously. Moreover, it's not the first time this certain editor is doing this, he has created numerous of such articles for his imaginative films. And all have been successfully deleted, of course. Johannes003 (talk) 14:23, 7 July 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete as lacking verifiability and thus WP:NF. Not wishing to presume bad faith, perhaps the overzealous author was mistaken and intended it be an article for Endrendrum Punnagai (2012). or perhaps he erred and intended it to be an article for the existing 1999 film Endrendrum Kaadhal by Manoj Bhatnagar? And we do understand that Englifications of Tamil words often give us many mis-spellings. Let issues of sourcing be addressed before any return is considered.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 21:36, 7 July 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.