Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/EnergySage


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  MBisanz  talk 13:34, 4 August 2016 (UTC)

EnergySage

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

promotional article for non notable firm--there are an impressive number of refs, but, as would be expected they are mostly notices or PR or merely mention the company. promotionalism plus borderline notability is a reason for deletion.  DGG ( talk ) 02:00, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. North America1000 02:49, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. North America1000 02:50, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Massachusetts-related deletion discussions. North America1000 02:50, 27 July 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete. Reading through the sources, I can't see much significant coverage at all, and the coverage that appears significant is all connected with the topic. Enterprisey (talk!) (formerly APerson) 03:48, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete -- appears to be a promo article & the subject lacks notability. K.e.coffman (talk) 04:23, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep a handful of the references are extensively profiled in Northeast reputable publications about subject. Profiles in addition to the several national publications containing more than trivial coverage meets WP:GNG. Note that energy sites are WP:SPAM and should be removed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Burroughs'10 (talk • contribs) 23:28, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as still none of this is actually convincing. SwisterTwister   talk  23:34, 2 August 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.