Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Energy Genesis Life Center


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. clear enough. There's an apparently related article that should be examined also: Jonathan Goldman  DGG ( talk ) 04:12, 6 August 2016 (UTC)

Energy Genesis Life Center

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable "technology", Google search found no independent in-depth coverage. Current sources are: #1, #3 self-published; #4, #5 not "independent", #2: I won't buy this on Kindle to check (unless someone donates 9,99 Euro), but it seems to be about the general concept of this method, not about this specific application. Even if "Energy Genesis" as specific topic was covered there, one questionable source from a clearly involved author (book info available on Amazon) would not be enough to establish notability. GermanJoe (talk) 07:25, 29 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 08:18, 29 July 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete. The centre appears to have previously been known as Life Vessel of the Rockies. Claims around healing technologies mean that WP:FRINGE applies here. There are not adequate sources provided to substantiate these claims. I searched but didn't find anything from a reliable source to overcome these concerns. I don't see that notability has been established for either this center or the technology used at this center. Drchriswilliams (talk) 09:23, 29 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Health and fitness-related deletion discussions. North America1000 20:29, 29 July 2016 (UTC)


 * Speedy delete - what on earth...? Not notable as WP:FRINGE. Blythwood (talk) 23:18, 29 July 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.