Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Energy Matters projects


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Cirt (talk) 01:36, 27 April 2010 (UTC)

Energy Matters projects

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Fails WP:CORP; no way of establishing notability given the lack of reliable, independent secondary sources. The article's references are trivial/in passing, not independent or both. Was nominated for PROD in 2007. Miracle Pen (talk) 18:25, 17 April 2010 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:04, 25 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:35, 19 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:35, 19 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete as currently written, for it completely lacks any reliable sources. Trying to find and to add some would be an exercise in futility, because search terms will find lots of false friends.  A redirect would not serve any purpose.  It's not energy law, and we don't have any articles more specific, such as Energy companies based in Australia. Bearian (talk) 22:13, 19 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Delete per nom. Also comes close to meeting WP:CSD as I'm not even seeing much in the text to indicate that the company is significant. --Darkwind (talk) 17:57, 25 April 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.