Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Energy revolution


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete -- JForget  01:26, 6 March 2008 (UTC)

Energy revolution

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Very unclear, article does not associate with the title, and it is on Greenpeace anyway. Redmarkviolinist Drop me a line 22:23, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete as soon as possible - NPOV. Deb (talk) 22:24, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete. It is a POV essay which looks like it was dumped in from some other source. It certainly is not an encyclopaedia article. It is also unclear and badly written. --DanielRigal (talk) 22:27, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
 * the basic idea of the article is to link greenpeace to development cooperation... it is best to work on modifying this document rather than outrightly deleting it. it will create a healthy debate on the subject matter. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Orkaambe (talk • contribs) 22:41, 2 March 2008 (UTC)  — Orkaambe (talk&#32;• contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * Comment: I think the comment above should be interpreted as a "keep" although I can't agree with it. It is not the purpose of Wikipedia to "create a healthy debate". This is an encyclopaedia. --DanielRigal (talk) 22:52, 2 March 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete, unsalvageable essay with confusing/misleading title. --Dhartung | Talk 06:04, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete as an essay. Wiki is not a soapbox. -- Whpq (talk) 19:16, 5 March 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.