Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Energyhelpline


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Delete - Although on first glance it appears that the article's subject is the focus of second-party sources, a thorough look shows this not to be the case. As noted below, fails notability. PanydThe muffin is not subtle 14:00, 14 May 2012 (UTC)

Energyhelpline

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

Highly-promotional advertisement for a company. Nothing whatsoever to suggest any form of notability, especially under WP:CORP. Wikipedia is not a business directory ( talk→  BWilkins   ←track ) 23:46, 27 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete - almost a G11.--Jasper Deng (talk) 00:20, 28 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 19:29, 28 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 19:29, 28 April 2012 (UTC)


 * keep - Company is notable both in terms of the amount of business transacted in the industry sector, ranking it with the likes of uSwitch - article could do with clean up, something I've tried to do in the past, but obviously not enough for peoples liking. Jasonfward (talk) 13:55, 1 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete - a small company, used by its own admission, by 1/6 of 1 % of the British public, which is a tiny market share. Bearian (talk)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, → B  music  ian  00:33, 4 May 2012 (UTC)


 * "used by its own admission, by 1/6 of 1 % of the British public" not sure how you work that out, but energy switching is an important business in the UK and Energyhelpline are in the top 3 switching companies, have at times been first, and since the energy is consumed and purchased by households, any count of how many reached needs to be vs households not people Jasonfward (talk) 17:51, 5 May 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.