Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Energyshop.com


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone  00:09, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

Energyshop.com

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

The speedy as advertising was declined for some reason half a year ago, but as it stands now the article is spam about a nonnotable website that fails WP:WEB. There's some wikipuffery involved here as well, as it appears well-referenced but the references are for trivial details and none of them go to assert the notability of the website. The site hasn't made an appearance on the news, and nothing can be found through a regular google search to show notability. Also, a conflict of interest is apparant with the creator "Ianatenergyshop".  Them From  Space  16:14, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - While I haven't looked at the history to see if someone removed the obvious spam, I only saw one sentence that could be considered a COI or POV and one section that has OR. I removed the POV and the OR.  The rest simply states facts about the company.  Still, I don't think the company is notable per WP:WEB or WP:COMPANY.  As a note, a company listing what it does or even creating an article about itself isn't spam or grounds for deletion.  Sentences like, "Company X is the best company" is spam.  Sentences like "Company X is service provider" is not spam.  The difference is a statement of opinion (POV) and a statement of fact.  Ol Yeller  '''Talktome 16:44, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. T-95 (talk) 17:33, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - Article seems like blatant advertising. Wacko Jack O   23:44, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete WP:ADVERT. -- samj in out 16:22, 21 March 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.