Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Enes Yilmazer


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --BDD (talk) 17:31, 17 December 2020 (UTC)

Enes Yilmazer

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Individual does not meet notability criteria of WP:GNG, WP:BIO, or WP:NSPORT. While he has won a world championship in slalom windsurfing, based on the criteria laid out for other sports in WP:NATHLETE, I don't believe this presumes notability since there is no article for the Professional Windsurfers Association. ... disco spinster   talk  20:52, 10 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. ...  disco spinster   talk  20:52, 10 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Turkey-related deletion discussions. ...  disco spinster   talk  20:52, 10 December 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. Kolma8 (talk) 21:11, 10 December 2020 (UTC)
 * * Alternatively, merge into Windsurfing. However, I don't see his name anywhere among the notable windsurfers in Windsurfing. Something tells me he fail GNG in general. Kolma8 (talk) 21:15, 10 December 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete Nom has a good argument, and I don't find anything supporting a keep. Jeepday (talk) 14:51, 14 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. This person could conceivably have a claim for an article focusing on his windsurfing merits (albeit some of them were in the youth categories) if RS references could be found, but I'm just speculating here, and in any case that would be an altogether different article then. But if that's the direction the creating editor wants to go, I can also live with draftifying until it's ready to be republished. --DoubleGrazing (talk) 16:19, 14 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete not enough reliable, 3rd-party, secondary independent sources to show notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 21:10, 15 December 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.