Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Enfield Square Mall


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. Sr13 00:48, 3 August 2007 (UTC)

Enfield Square Mall

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable mall, several bits of WP:OR within ("Many mistook it as related to nearby Westfield, Mass."). No noteworthy GHits in a search, so it also fails WP:RS and WP:V Ten Pound Hammer  • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps•Review?) 22:42, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Weak delete this one has at least some information about significant changes in ownership, but its unsourced. Delete unless RSs can be found. DGG (talk) 06:15, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
 * I tried, unsuccessfully, to find sources, and that's why this is at AfD. Ten Pound Hammer  • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps•Review?) 19:16, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Even if sources are found, I'm not sure how change of ownership makes it notable. Oli Filth 01:28, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete no assertion of notability, A7. Having said that - in case someone simply states for some reason it's not a valid candidate for speedy deletion because it's not exactly "a company" - the article makes no effort to assert WP:N so I cannot see how the subject meets WP:N. Unsourced, so WP:NOR/ WP:RS.Garrie 21:36, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Oli Filth 01:28, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
 * declined to speedy it's here, let it be discussed. If nothing else, the article asserts notable tenants. this is not enough to justify a keep, but I consider it enough to prevent a speedy. Better to have it closed in another 2 or 3 days if nobody does find sources. DGG (talk) 02:38, 2 August 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.