Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Enforced retirement


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to Mandatory retirement. (Non-administrator closure) NorthAmerica1000 01:35, 9 August 2014 (UTC)

Enforced retirement

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I can't find any sources using this definition. The term appears to actually be synonymous with Mandatory retirement. Given that there's already a page for mandatory retirement, there's no need for this page. Tchaliburton (talk) 17:45, 1 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Comment: Mandatory retirement is not the same as enforced retirement. Jonas Vinther (talk) 17:48, 1 August 2014 (UTC)
 * According to whom? These suggest otherwise: 1, 2, 3. Tchaliburton (talk) 17:57, 1 August 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete - There is some use of this term in news and books but this article seems WP:MADEUP and is original research There are no citations because there is no reliable sources that explain the notability of the term in this article's way.  - Pmedema (talk) 18:51, 1 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Redirect - The search term to redirect to to Mandatory retirement is viable. - Pmedema (talk) 13:51, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Redirect: Then lets redirect it to Mandatory retirement. Jonas Vinther (talk) 20:30, 1 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Redirect to mandatory retirement. Seems like the obvious solution. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 00:35, 4 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Redirect to mandatory retirement. Kierzek (talk) 16:32, 7 August 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.