Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Engineerboards.com


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was is to KISS, delete. - Mailer Diablo 09:19, 27 September 2006 (UTC)

Engineerboards.com
Speedy deletion tag removed. No Google hits for (link:www.engineerboards.com) and Alexa traffic rank of 1,290,522. Fails: Notability (web). --  Netsnipe  ►  16:23, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete no reliable sources WilyD 16:25, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete for failing WP:WEB and being blatant WP:SPAM. Prolog 16:27, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment: Do all of you work for PPI? Road guy 17:25, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Qui? WilyD 18:30, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
 * by the way who are PPI? Nigel (Talk) 19:49, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete please can't find anything polite to say so will keep quiet --Nigel (Talk) 17:49, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Question Is there a way to make this page temporary while we work on it?Road guy 20:12, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
 * No. However, you can move it out of the encyclopedia proper and into your userspace (see Userfication) which will automatically end this current review. You can continue to work on the article there before you move it back into the main encyclopedia at which point the article may be reviewed again. --  Netsnipe  ►  20:59, 21 September 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete because it's a conspiracy to keep the little man down. Danny Lilithborne 21:05, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
 * True Story Even if this gets deleted it doesnt change the fact that most of you havenot kissed a girl beforeRoad guy 12:51, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment: Does anyone else find this comment from a person who runs an engineering web forum kind of ironic? = ) --  Netsnipe  ►  14:01, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Maybe - do you have reliable sources about engineers success with members of their preferred gender versus that of internet geeks? I can't seem to estimate it from first principles. WilyD 16:56, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
 * While most engineers are "nerds" they make $$$$, unlike internet wikipedia admin wannabees (i read some of your pages)Road guy 19:57, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Thanks anyhow, but I'm an astronomer, not an engineer, so I'm not really qualified to join ;) WilyD 20:58, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Can I be part of this please - I'll kiss her tonight when I get home I promise --Nigel (Talk) 13:01, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
 * True, Astronomers dont really do anything to help society, thus there is no need for you to have a PE LicenseRoad guy 13:56, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
 * It certainly is the case that no one without a PE licence ever does anything useful for society. WilyD 23:34, 23 September 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.