Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Engineering, Technology and Applied Science Research


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Barkeep49 (talk) 20:44, 10 October 2020 (UTC)

Engineering, Technology and Applied Science Research

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Indexing nowhere selective. Fails WP:NJOURNALS and WP:GNG. &#32; Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 00:21, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academic journals-related deletion discussions. &#32; Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 00:21, 30 September 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete. Beyond obscure. Guy (help! - typo?) 18:19, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Question Have we generally decided that the Emerging Sources Citation Index is not sufficiently selective to count? XOR&#39;easter (talk) 22:05, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
 * ESCI is proto-notability. Useful to librarians to keep an eye on a journal which may become of interest down the road. Hence the name 'Emerging source. &#32; Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 23:12, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete. No evidence of passing WP:GNG, and I for one don't think the Emerging Sources Citation Index is adequately selective for listing to count as evidence that "the journal is considered by reliable sources to be influential in its subject area", as asked for by WP:NJOURNALS #1. The very name "emerging", like the phrase "up and coming", to me is a flag that it has not yet arrived. —David Eppstein (talk) 22:46, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete. Per nom, fails WP:NJOURNALS and WP:GNG. Footlessmouse (talk) 07:36, 10 October 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.