Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/England U17 Youth Scheme


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   speedy delete. The British Cup results at the bottom were the clincher that the article has no validity whatsoever; there is no such tournament, so this is a hoax. —C.Fred (talk) 23:45, 26 July 2010 (UTC)

England U17 Youth Scheme

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Unreferenced, consists almost entirely of OR, written by an author with a definite COI, entirely inappropriate for inclusion in an encyclopedia in its current form.  elektrik SHOOS  22:56, 25 July 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete. As per above. --Whoosit (talk) 23:14, 25 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. ChrisTheDude (talk) 09:48, 26 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - in addition to the above, I can't find any evidence that any of these players even exist, or that an under-17 British Cup has ever taken place. Looks like some sort of fiction/wish-fulfilment thing..... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 09:48, 26 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete; probable hoax based on the fact that neither myself nor Chris could verify it. Even if it is genuine, I would say delete anyway based on being completely unsourced (WP:V), questionable notability (WP:N) and a random combination of players and statistics (WP:NOTSTATS). --WFC-- 10:15, 26 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete as obvious hoax. – PeeJay 11:13, 26 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete as hoax. GiantSnowman 19:29, 26 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete as unverifiable. Re-creation of England u17 2010/11 which was redirected to the real England under-17 team page. cheers, Struway2 (talk) 20:30, 26 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete Obvious hoax. Safiel (talk) 23:25, 26 July 2010 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.