Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/English-Chinese translation

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was DELETE. User:Wile E. Heresiarch has speedied it. Mgm|(talk) 20:50, Feb 9, 2005 (UTC)

English-Chinese translation
Wrong title, possibly unencyclopedic subject, no context, looks like an advert and could be a copyvio. Other than that, fine. Actually, could be a speedy, but I'll put it here first in case anybody can make sense of it. sjorford// 16:57, 27 Jan 2005 (UTC) This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.
 * Delete I am having huge difficulty matching title to content... Smoddy | &epsilon;&iota;&pi;&epsilon;&tau;&epsilon; 22:40, 27 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Speed deleted as patent nonsense. Content unrelated to title, and an incomprehensible mess to boot. Wile E. Heresiarch 00:46, 28 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Agree with speedy deletion. Deleted history reveals it has been speedy deleted several times over the past month by different admins, and probably a few times more before MW 1.4 started providing good logs of deletions. -- Cyrius|&#9998; 02:10, 29 Jan 2005 (UTC)