Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/English Wikipedia 2


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was nomination withdrawn. MER-C 02:23, 24 September 2006 (UTC)

English Wikipedia
The previous discussion has not mentioned the problem of WP:NOR. I wonder how this could survive the voting when the majority was for merging with the Wikipedia and only Instantnood, GRider, Kappa, Capitalistroadster, SγωΩηΣ, Jmabel, and unknown were against it. -- Zorro CX 16:48, 23 September 2006 (UTC) No reference at all (contrary to Wikipedia). -- Zorro CX 20:36, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Pretty sure this meets WP:WEB, since most things written about "Wikipedia" are about the English Wikipedia. Merge possible I guess, discuss that on the talk page, an AfD isn't needed for a merge. --W.marsh 17:40, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
 * OK, it was just a proposal of the user googl. -- Zorro CX 18:45, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep It indeed has been the subject of multiple non-trivial works, just see the Wikipedia Signpost's "Wikipedia in the News" section. Some P.   E  rson  18:42, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. This is without question a notable subject, worse case scenario it can be merged to Wikipedia but either way this is not something to be discussed on Articles for deletion.  There are quite litereally hundreds of non-trivial news articles written about Wikipedia, specifically the English Wikipedia, and usually a dozen current news articles at any given time on Google News.  Yamaguchi先生 18:57, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Do you distinguish between the articles Wikipedia and English Wikipedia? The first one is not the subject of this discussion. -- Zorro CX 20:00, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. Bad Faith nomination. SYSS Mouse 19:20, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
 * This I denied. I originally proposed only Articles for deletion/Czech Wikipedia, but the user googl suggested this. -- Zorro CX 19:40, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Please do not disrupt Wikipedia to make a WP:POINT, the English Wikipedia far exceeds the bar set by WP:WEB guidelines and I request that you withdraw this nomination. Yamaguchi先生 20:16, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
 * I deny it was a disruption. I read the original discussion and I noticed that majority was against keeping the article. WP:NOR was not discussed at all. No one denies notability of the Wikipedia as a such, but only the English one as a year before.
 * You're talking about an afd which was over an article only 2 sentences long. Bwithh 21:33, 23 September 2006 (UTC)


 * I agree to withdraw this nomination, but woudn't be better to discuss a question of NOR? -- Zorro CX 20:27, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. Same nonsense as Articles for deletion/Czech Wikipedia. Timichal 19:28, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep The English Wikipedia is the most popular and the one with the most articles. It is very notable. Ric36 20:08, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep Nuisance afd nom. Nominator has withdrawn the afd Bwithh 21:33, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep quite notable.--  ExpImp talk con 21:44, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep per nom withdrawn. - Kookykman| (t) e 23:41, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.