Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/English for Integrated Studies Project


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Cirt (talk) 13:53, 22 December 2009 (UTC)

English for Integrated Studies Project

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  AfD statistics)

This article appears to fall under WP:SOAP and WP:NOR, as the author appears to be the creator of the project itself and the references section cites only the author's own unpublished documents. Simple Google searches for the subject reveal no significant third-party results. Although a commendable effort, I don't think the inclusion of this article in Wikipedia is warranted. Paul_012 (talk) 07:43, 13 December 2009 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Tim Song (talk) 00:48, 20 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Thailand-related deletion discussions.  -- Paul_012 (talk) 07:49, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions.  -- Paul_012 (talk) 07:50, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Delete: Fails on most aspects of wp:No original research. Also seems an advert and is possibly being used as webspace as his site links back to wp article. Mattg82 (talk) 01:48, 20 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete, this is at best a paper. Not an encyclopedia article. Geschichte (talk) 18:35, 20 December 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Hello, the creator of this page was the initator of the EIS project. That is correct. There is no third-party results because it is a very new project already under suspicion of the Ministry of Education. I think people make it themselves too easy deleting pages here. Maybe you should ask about reason here before deleting the whole article. No one needs to hurry deleting articles. I just wanted to say that this English for Integrated Studies project is already well known by the Ministy of Education of Thailand and it may be included in Thailand's new school curriculum. So please keep the article. Thank you —Preceding unsigned comment added by 125.27.85.53 (talk) 07:24, 29 December 2009 (UTC)