Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/English media


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete and recreate as redirect. Espresso Addict (talk) 02:39, 30 April 2008 (UTC)

English media

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Unencyclopedic, not article.  Otolemur crassicaudatus  (talk) 05:14, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete, just short of db-nonsense, I suppose, but obviously not anything in article form. --Dhartung | Talk 05:58, 24 April 2008 (UTC)


 * Speedy delete. Body completely unrelated to subject. This is pretty much gibberish. TallNapoleon (talk) 08:41, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete, definite nonsense. MrPrada (talk) 08:42, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Make it a worthwhile plausible redirect to Media in the United Kingdom instead.  Nate  • ( chatter ) 11:34, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Good idea.--Dhartung | Talk 18:37, 24 April 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete, the mainspace is for articles, not idle observations on what you see in the papers one day. Lankiveil (speak to me) 11:39, 24 April 2008 (UTC).
 * Speedy delete Patent WP:NONSENSE Gary King ( talk )  20:06, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Redirect as suggested by Nate. I don't quite understand all the comments about this being nonsense. It is a perfectly comprehensible and verifiable statement, but under the wrong title and already covered better at Bristol Rovers F.C.. Phil Bridger (talk) 11:28, 26 April 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.