Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/English porno film directors


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete. —Quarl (talk) 2007-03-08 10:58Z 

English porno film directors

 * - (View AfD) (View log)

Since this article was created it's been bogus. Note the references to "Ben Dover", and mafias. If you read the article carefully you'll basically notice that it's crap. It's been continuously edited, making it even worse from the original. "English porno film directors", is not a reference to individual directors, but a moronic article about Ben Dover and his mafia woman.

I hope this can be deleted asap.

Beelake 13:21, 3 March 2007 (UTC) One wonders who Beelake is! Also his motivation for wanting to suppress the truth and freedom of speech? Porn Gold by David Hebditch and Nick Anning two highly respected authors has also been suppressed it seems! The truth is that an investigation of Ben Dover and Mike Freeman and the raid on Videx Ltd will uncover corruption at extremely high levels. Where is "mafia women" mentioned? Mike Freeman, film director and former director of Videx Ltd http://www.melonfarmers.co.uk/books.htm — Preceding unsigned comment added by 151.83.9.8 (talk • contribs)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletions.   -- SkierRMH 06:32, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
 * This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT 09:20, 5 March 2007 (UTC)

No-one has commented on Porn Gold and perhaps to be fair they should read the references on Mike Freeman before commenting further. Porn Gold by David Hebditch and Nick Anning is a hardback and is available from libraries on request. It is also online to official librarians. Linda Pow, teacher.
 * Strong Delete Poorly written, unsourced, original research, in which the title bears little resemblance to the content, and what content there is appears to be non-encycolpedic. StuartDouglas 14:50, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete As above. Meaningful username 22:33, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. It is essentially an essay (possibly in violation of WP:BLP) that is about something different than what the title suggests.  It may even be a hoax. -- Black Falcon 08:01, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Worthless artcile, doesn't seem to make sense or be historically accurate. Borderline speedy delete for patent nonsense. A1octopus 19:21, 6 March 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.