Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/English radical alliance


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. &mdash; Spaceman  Spiff  23:28, 24 February 2010 (UTC)

English radical alliance

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

This political party isn't notable. There's no mention of it in any reliable sources, it only gets mentioned on blogs and forums. (A prod was removed without explanation). Fences &amp;  Windows  17:40, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions.  --  Fences  &amp;  Windows  17:41, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions.  --  Fences  &amp;  Windows  17:41, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete, non-existant WP:RS, fails WP:N. I am the initial prodder. -Zeus-u 17:52, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. Zero coverage in independent reliable sources. At a push, might warrant a mention in the article on the Campaign for an English Parliament. Chris Neville-Smith (talk) 18:08, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep -- This is clearly a fringe group. I expect we will find they are putting up a candidate or two at the election.  If so, I think we will have to keep it until the General Election is over.  Peterkingiron (talk) 18:35, 21 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Eh? You reckon they might stand in the general election, so we have to keep the article? See WP:CRYSTAL. And standing in elections, even if they do, does not confer automatic notability. Fences  &amp;  Windows  00:22, 22 February 2010 (UTC)
 * delete as the above comment, if they get as far as standing in the general election then they may be notable, but now that amounts to WP:CRYSTAL. No news ghits as you'd expect for any notable political party (especially given the right leaning press here).-- JohnBlackburne wordsdeeds 21:47, 24 February 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.