Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Engorgement


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 01:14, 24 November 2013 (UTC)

Engorgement

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Unsourced dicdef, no sourcing found, just books that use the term in passing. Deprodded without comment. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 22:19, 16 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep. It's far from being a great article but it has potential to be expanded. Even if not, it would need to remain as a disambig. violet/riga [talk] 23:18, 16 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Potential to be expanded with what? Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 00:44, 17 November 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete. No indication that it is anything more than a dictdef, much less a full-blown biology term, as indicated by its total lack of references. Also not a dab page candidate, as there is no Engorgement (band), Engorgement (film), etc. Clarityfiend (talk) 02:37, 17 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 02:39, 17 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organisms-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 02:39, 17 November 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete. Just a WP:DICDEF. Any potential content is covered already by the articles in the "see also." -- 101.119.15.13 (talk) 06:24, 17 November 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.