Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Enhancement or quenching of QD, Q-wire and QW radiations (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. czar 03:28, 25 April 2021 (UTC)

Enhancement or quenching of QD, Q-wire and QW radiations
AfDs for this article:


 * – ( View AfD View log )

Previous AfD closed as no consensus in 2009. There is no sourced content about the general topic, failing WP:SYNTH, and all non-lead content is about specific studies of zinc oxide nanoparticles; the title also reads like a scientific paper. Sourced content should be merged to Zinc oxide, Quantum dot, Quantum wire, and Quantum well. Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Physics –LaundryPizza03 ( d c̄ ) 00:51, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. –LaundryPizza03 ( d  c̄ ) 00:51, 18 April 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete As the nomination correctly notices, this is a disparate collection of papers. Besides WP:SYNTH, the lack of a source for the subject as a whole makes it non notable. Note also that the article has been largely abandoned since its creation in 2009. Tercer (talk) 08:32, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete WP:SYNTH that isn't helping anybody. It reads like the abstracts from a research group's "our recent publications" webpage were dumped into an article. The sources can in principle be reused elsewhere, but the text here is so opaque that we don't need to worry about holding onto it. XOR&#39;easter (talk) 15:59, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Thanks, the first (and least specialized) source has been incorporated into the Zinc oxide article. The optical properties of that material seem to be under-documented there. –Laundry<b style="color:#fb0">Pizza</b><b style="color:#b00">03</b> ( d c̄ ) 14:43, 19 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete as others have said. This is almost like a promo article for a research group. -Kj cheetham (talk) 08:25, 19 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. It doesn't meet WP:GNG as per all. Zackdasnicker (talk) 18:03, 20 April 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.