Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Enigma Prison


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. WP:SNOW. The Bushranger One ping only 12:24, 20 December 2015 (UTC)

Enigma Prison

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Does not appear to be a notable video game. A search for sources reveals only unreliable posts that discuss its IndieGogo campaign, as well as a Steam Greenlight. No reviews, no reliable coverage about development; the game itself doesn't appear to have been released yet. Note that the article's creator appears to be none other than the game's developer. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 06:41, 15 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 06:42, 15 December 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete. As far as I can tell, this game hasn't released yet and hasn't received any true coverage in independent and reliable sources. As such, it's just WP:TOOSOON for this game to have an article at this point in time. When it releases and gains some coverage via reviews or other attention from WP:RS, it can be re-created - although I'd recommend that this go through WP:AfC first given that there does appear to be a WP:COI here. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  08:21, 15 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - Hardly even much to suggest satisfying video games notability guidelines. SwisterTwister   talk  08:54, 15 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:25, 16 December 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete Per nom and Tokyogirl. Zero hits in WP:VG's reliable source custom search. -- ferret (talk) 02:29, 16 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete. Article topic lacks significant coverage from reliable, independent sources. (?) It had zero hits in a video game reliable sources custom Google search. There are no worthwhile redirect targets. czar  03:01, 16 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete per others. Citobun (talk) 15:12, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:GNG. --The1337gamer (talk) 17:55, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. Not notable enough to have its own page, and it fails WP:GNG. AdrianGamer (talk) 09:31, 20 December 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.