Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Enlaces


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Keep. If anyone finds that this material is copyvio, please CSD tag it as such. No evidence provided or found to that effect, here.  Jerry  delusional ¤ kangaroo 04:41, 18 December 2008 (UTC)

Enlaces

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Promotional, no context, reads like copyvio. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 02:26, 13 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. I don't rightly understand what this article is. An overview of some project? An evaluation thereof? Drmies (talk) 03:14, 13 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep (unless copyvio). I don't see any problem with an article about a Chilean educational programme -- though this one could do with some cleaning up and perhaps more balance. 194.72.9.25 (talk) 04:05, 13 December 2008 (UTC).
 * Merge any verifiable and non copyvio material with Education in Chile.  Linguist At Large  06:21, 13 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Merge with Education in Chile- the article is about a program from the Chile’s Ministry of Education and allegedly more than 3,372,943 students are involved. References must be verifiable before any inclusion.--Jmundo (talk) 17:23, 13 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions.   -- • Gene93k (talk) 07:58, 13 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Chile-related deletion discussions.   -- • Gene93k (talk) 07:58, 13 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep. Unless someone can prove this is a copyvio, I don't see any immediate issues with the article. There's no obvious promotion going on - any I missed can be edited out and the lead gives all the required context. - Mgm|(talk) 22:38, 13 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep - Unless proven to be a copyvio, just because it reads like one doesn't make it a candidate for deletion. &mdash; neuro(talk) 09:26, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep per above. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 02:44, 15 December 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.