Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/EnlightenNext


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. (WP:NPASR). North America1000 05:16, 21 June 2016 (UTC)

EnlightenNext

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

WP:NME does not seem to be satisfied here. The secondary sources cited are all trivial or marginal mentions of this magazine and the awards won are not of the significant sort (Webby, Eddie, and Ozzie awards are bottom of the barrel sorts). Since the magazine is no longer in publication, we can safely assume that basically all that will ever be written about this thing has been written and there isn't much left for establishing notability besides. jps (talk) 13:19, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. GabeIglesia (talk) 15:26, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philosophy-related deletion discussions. GabeIglesia (talk) 15:26, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Massachusetts-related deletion discussions. GabeIglesia (talk) 15:26, 30 May 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, st170e talk 01:18, 7 June 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 06:21, 14 June 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.