Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Enlisted commissioning


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Feezo (send a signal | watch the sky) 04:44, 8 April 2011 (UTC)

Enlisted commissioning

 * – ( View AfD View log )

At best, this is a list of requirements to enter some undefined armed forces program, and should be deleted per WP:NOTDIR, for instance. Drmies (talk) 02:58, 30 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 12:45, 30 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 12:45, 30 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete. An unencyclopaedic list of military procedures. -- Necrothesp (talk) 13:06, 30 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Mustang (military officer). There are implications for this in nearly every military in the world, not just the USAF. The concept is notable enough, but the current article is just a dump of resources.  bahamut0013  words deeds 14:07, 30 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete - the existing page is meritless. I agree that it is a notable topic. I am not in favour of a redirect to Mustang (military officer) which has nothing particular to say on the process. Better to keep a red link to encourage article creation - see WP:Red. TerriersFan (talk) 21:49, 3 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Merge to Mustang (military officer), useful information can be saved and placed in article. Redirect not required as other nations also have enlisted commissioning programs. --RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 19:57, 30 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete Content does not fit the title, that's for sure. Content would have to go under 'List of USAF scholarship and commissioning programs and their entrance requirements', and still be missing any content about the actual programs other than their entrance requirements, so I recommend that not be created. I have to say, though, Enlisted commissioning seems like a valid title, but all the coverage I can find in a quick search is trivial, mentioning that 'A was a graduate of the X enlisted commissioning program at Y'. Would not object to a Keep of the title with entirely new sourced content. Anarchangel (talk) 22:10, 30 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete Unsourced article, and WP:NOTDIR+WP:IINFO. Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information. Thisistimothy (talk) 17:55, 7 April 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.