Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ennaval


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Izno (talk) 03:57, 3 October 2020 (UTC)

Ennaval

 * – ( View AfD View log )

All information is unsourced. Only one reliable source exists but it only mentions the film in a passing mention. TamilMirchi (talk) 03:07, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep: Hello user, you are probably a user from Tamil Nadu, I am a Malaysian myself. I believe Malaysian Tamil language films article are very notable, as all of them are released nationwide in Malaysia, there are sources, our local media have reportings about these films. It is not like student film, it is REAL theatrical films, no reason for not being notable. I feel terribly sad that you want to nominate the deletion of all these articles, most contributed by me. I believe all these can stay. And, the article is well-written and well-cited, plus with good formatting. I WILL ADD MORE RELIABLE SOURCES. You could just add reference tag. Please reconsider and unnominate the deletion, thank you so much ;) User:LoveFromBJM (User talk:LoveFromBJM 04:25, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
 * You must have known these films is very significant in my countries. Although those cited websites are not news website, they are still media website that reports, making these films notable. Meanwhile, these articles are shorter, BUT you may realized that they are really written properly.

For Ennaval: Latest Please read the latest version, I have added References column and add sources. // I removed unsourced content, and added references FINAS, Raaga, and 2 The Star reliable news site references (Raaga is the local media websites that brings reliable information. FINAS is Official and very notable. The Star's 2 articles also added, although it only mentions the film name, it means that the film is notable.) // Added IMDB title, remove other external links --User:LoveFromBJM (User talk:LoveFromBJM)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. TamilMirchi (talk) 03:07, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Malaysia-related deletion discussions. TamilMirchi (talk) 03:07, 25 September 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete None of the citations are reviews of the film, just film databases, articles on the actors, or announcements that the film was released or was shown at a festival. None establish notability and nothing else was found during a search. Donaldd23 (talk) 00:26, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete- Donaldd23's rationale above reflects my opinion exactly. Sunshine1191 (talk) 11:36, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete - does not meet WP:GNG or WP:NFILM, which are the agreed guidelines for films Spiderone  16:01, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep The film has enough citations and sources to be deemed notable and existence of the film. And it has clear formatting to add my point that it is too harsh to mark it for deletion rather than adding tags to it. KesunyianAyam (talk) 13:28, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
 * The issue is notability here, not the page format. Movies are generally reviewed by critics during their theatrical run and definitely within a month of premiere. So it is highly implausible that reliable reviews will turn up a year after release. Wiki is an encyclopaedia for notable films, not a film database. IMDB does an excellent job at that. Sunshine1191 (talk) 15:59, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
 * IMDb does a poor job of that with many errors and fake information, that is why it is an unreliable source, imv Atlantic306 (talk) 00:23, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
 * I said that IMDB does an excellent job at maintaining a record of films, which it does. The database covers films of a variety of languages and countries including these films currently listed at Afd. Never said that the records were a hundred percent factual or completely reliable. Sunshine1191 (talk) 03:57, 2 October 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete: None of the refs provided appear to cover the film in enough depth needed to establish notability. Might be a case of toosoon but currently fails NFILM. TheRedDomitor (talk) 15:10, 2 October 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.