Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Enock Poulsen


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 22:09, 10 May 2017 (UTC)

Enock Poulsen

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable boxer that fails WP:NBOX and WP:GNG. Coverage in secondary sources is routine coverage of matches in a boxing specific magazine. Other than that, I can't find anything that would get him close to GNG. TonyBallioni (talk) 02:03, 3 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Boxing-related deletion discussions. Peter Rehse (talk) 19:11, 3 May 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete As per nominator.Peter Rehse (talk) 19:11, 3 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete. The subject of this article lacks notability. Bmbaker88 (talk) 12:42, 4 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete He fails to meet the notability criteria for boxers and lacks the significant independent coverage needed to meet WP:GNG. Papaursa (talk) 16:02, 6 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:47, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Denmark-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:47, 7 May 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.