Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Enoh's point


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  Sandstein  08:18, 24 March 2012 (UTC)

Enoh's point

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Obvious hoax article, a search for Enoh's point only brings up15 Wikipedia pages. Darkness Shines (talk) 22:34, 16 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete, same conclusion. Sandy Georgia  (Talk) 22:35, 16 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment. The topic may not be notable – the one source given is not independent of the subject – but I see no reason to think this is a hoax. --Lambiam 22:47, 16 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete. Not a notable term for what may or may not be a notable concept. Clicking on the first link in the article takes you to an International Journal of Neurosurgery publication written by, among others, Enoh N Kingsly, making that a primary source at best. Faint whiff of conflict of interest too, but the main concern is notability, something which I can find no evidence of for this subject. Dylanfromthenorth (talk) 23:06, 16 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete Not turning up anything that makes me disagree with the previous comments. Mark Arsten (talk) 02:06, 17 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 02:15, 17 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete: ENOCHS POINT is a geographical region, I can't find any reference on this thingy as a topic of anatomy. Fails WP:V. -- Supernova Explosion   Talk  10:59, 17 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete - There is no evidence this is a significant anatomical spot for medical procedures. One single paper attributabel to teh person who coined the term (presumably after himself) with zero hits in Google scholar. -- Whpq (talk) 13:10, 19 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete - The one paper is attributed to Enoh Nkongho Kingsly et al. Searching scholar on that name turns up dodgy websites on the "LYMPHOCYTE WEAKENING FACTOR HYPOTHESIS", a variety of HIV denialism? Not worth keeping on the long shot that there might be some value hidden somewhere.LeadSongDog come howl!  20:02, 20 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete obvious hoax. Should be speedy deleted per WP:SNOW. JDDJS (talk) 17:03, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.