Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Enrico Baccarini


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone  23:42, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

Enrico Baccarini

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Fails WP:BIO. His "awards" are inclusion in Who's Who and the AIA -- they aren't really awards. Nor do his books confer notability on his person. ScienceApologist (talk) 19:13, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.   --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  20:42, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Paranormal-related deletion discussions.   --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  20:43, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Not notable in anyway whatsoever. If the only claims needed for notability are membership in Who's Who and AIA there would be a massive amount of articles on people who are not notable in any way, shape, or form. TonyBallioni (talk) 22:26, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete If the "awards" section is any indication, this person is not notable at all. ChildofMidnight (talk) 08:04, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Baccarini is mentioned in quite a few websites, but these seem, generally, to be either promotional or trivial. I can't find anything I would term notable. Tim Ross   (talk)  14:06, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - non-notable for academic or creative achievements. No reliable secondary sources for notability.  Springnuts (talk) 16:53, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment. Some of these Google News hits seem to provide substantial coverage in reliable sources, especially this, this and this, but my Italian is rather rudimentary and my Hungarian non-existent, so confirmation would be useful. Phil Bridger (talk) 21:20, 11 January 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.