Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Enrique A. Pollack


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was nominated in error. Let this article be nominated for deletion by someone with a valid reason to believe it needs to be deleted. --Tony Sidaway 15:31, 18 May 2007 (UTC)

Enrique A. Pollack

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

DRV overturned a G4 deletion of this article, finding new sources for notability were present. This matter is resubmitted to AfD for fresh consideration. This is a procedural nomination, so I abstain. Xoloz 01:47, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Object to procedural nomination. So far as I can see, next to nobody disputed that the newest sources are plenty to establish notability. I say to keep, in case it isn't obvious. -Amarkov moo! 02:45, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Shrug. If the AfD is now closed because of your objection, and someone later returns to object to that closure, all our heads explode. :)  It is noted that you were among those endorsing deletion at DRV, but I see no reason not to leave the matter open for five days, to see if anyone finds the new sources unsatisfactory. Xoloz 02:52, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
 * No reason not to leave it open, definitely. Discussion can't hurt. -Amarkov moo! 03:26, 18 May 2007 (UTC)


 * Keep The new sources seem to establish notability, no reason to delete now. Charlie 06:46, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.