Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Enrique Odría Sotomayor


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- RoySmith (talk) 02:40, 30 November 2015 (UTC)

Enrique Odría Sotomayor

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I am bringing this article to AfD in hopes of stopping the edit war on whether the article should be speedied under G11. (Being written from a neutral point of view, G11 clearly does not apply.) Subject is probably not notable and just misses being eligible for speedy deletion under A7. —teb728 t c 22:36, 22 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. clpo13(talk) 22:46, 22 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. clpo13(talk) 22:46, 22 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Peru-related deletion discussions. clpo13(talk) 22:46, 22 November 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete Per WP:NTEMP and WP:NOTADVOCATE. This politician still a precandidate of a new movement in formation, not yet a political party. The sources indicate as "precandidate" (November 6),  (November 12). The Peruvian Electoral Office doesn't have an official statement about this person (see second external link of the article). From July he's collecting signs for the legalization of his movement, but don't have any progress. Also, the Google Search finds few results, confirming lack of notability. Until yesterday his Twitter account announced him as precandidate, but the uncomfortable situation in Wikipedia yesterday, changed his status as "candidate" without confirmation of electoral authorities. Maybe someone close to the candidate, maybe himself, tries to promote his precandidature. --Taichi (talk) 04:38, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Taichi is not even an English editor, he has made it his personal goal to delete this content. When you find many articles about a subject then it is found outside Wikipedia therefore valid. But just as stated before, it seems that autocracy is the dominating factor. WIKIPEDIA should be careful as a public organization that asks for public funds to have people with personal vendettas. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.87.68.133 (talk) 09:53, 28 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Yes, but this article will be kept or deleted based on arguments about whether the subject is notable or not. Do you have anything to say about his notability? The closing admin will not be favorably impressed by your personal attack. —teb728 t c 11:14, 28 November 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete Not yet notable under WP:POLITICIAN. It's simply too soon. clpo13(talk) 17:11, 28 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Launching a new political party isn't an automatic inclusion freebie on Wikipedia, especially when the party doesn't even have an article about it yet. But nothing else here constitutes a substantive notability claim at all. Delete, without prejudice against recreation in the future if he actually wins election to a notable office. Bearcat (talk) 18:13, 29 November 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.