Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ensemble (software)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. henrik • talk  11:42, 31 October 2009 (UTC)

Ensemble (software)

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Technical nomination only. AfD tag was added by an IP who couldn't create the discussion. Eastmain (talk) 03:58, 16 October 2009 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Tim Song (talk) 02:48, 23 October 2009 (UTC)
 * IP's rationale was "PROD removed by creator. PROD reason was nonnotable software, no sources, seems like advertising." (copied from the article's history log by Eastmain (talk) 04:02, 16 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.  -- Eastmain (talk) 04:02, 16 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment. Here's a newspaper article from India: http://www.thehindubusinessline.com/2007/07/24/stories/2007072450460400.htm See also this Google News archive search Possibly notable after all. See the article's history log for some context. -- Eastmain (talk) 04:27, 16 October 2009 (UTC) -- Eastmain (talk) 04:27, 16 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Non consumer software like a enterprise integration and SOA platform ought to face a fairly high bar for notability.  The Google news archive results seem to be mostly press releases about contracts, releases, or minor trade awards.  That isn't enough to get past the bar in such a spam-laden field, where every minor player imagines that they rate an encyclopedia article. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 12:26, 16 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * If deleted, dabify since there are many "Ensemble" in software. If kept, rename to InterSystems Ensemble, and dabify the primary name. 76.66.201.240 (talk) 04:11, 23 October 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.