Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ensim


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 00:26, 16 August 2010 (UTC)

Ensim

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

The article appears to fail WP:ORG. Apart from press releases from the company and associated derivative articles, I find nothing in Google News to show that the lack of any significant impact in independent sources or on the historical record is likely to be addressed in the near future. That a company exists, has a partnership with Microsoft and a range of products does not make it notable for an encyclopaedic article. Fæ (talk) 22:13, 9 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions.  -- Fæ (talk) 22:13, 9 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.  -- Fæ (talk) 22:14, 9 August 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete Article is overly promotional, and a google search returned nothing that could realistically be used to establish notability. RadManCF &#x2622; open frequency 22:56, 9 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete Article has no references that show notability. Miami33139 (talk) 23:48, 9 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. Advertising for yet another back-office IT business: the product provides, via an extensible Service-Oriented Architecture, access control, identity management, change management, automated provisioning, reporting and auditing, password and role management, along with delegated administration and device/client configuration.  - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 14:26, 10 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete - obvious promotion of non-notable firm; could have been speedied as an advert. -- Orange Mike  &#x007C;   Talk  18:10, 10 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:38, 11 August 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.