Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Enter Within


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 18:08, 15 June 2009 (UTC)

Enter Within
The article's author states he is the producer of this film. All the references are networking sites and the film festival apparently exists only as a group site on Youtube. There is no reference on IMDB. The name "Enter Within" is inherently difficult to google but as far as I can tell there are no independent 3rd party references to this film on the net or on google news. In short this is a Youtube clip by S Beckman currently seen by 73 viewers. It has no obvious notability. Prod removed with no improvement in the article Porturology (talk) 11:50, 1 June 2009 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Fritzpoll (talk) 10:04, 8 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - I agree, I couldn't find any in independent sources for the film either. After speaking with the author he understands this and accepts that the article does not qualify as notable. -- Noosentaal ·talk· 12:54, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  -- TexasAndroid (talk) 13:15, 8 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete without prejudice. If.when the film gets coverage and gains notability, allow it back. Currently I find no RS on the film, though yes it exists, and even less on the festival where it won its award. But this all can change. Perhaps userfy to author in anticipation of its possible return?  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 20:57, 8 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete - no coverage in reliable sources to establish notability. A non-notable award at a non-notable "festival" does not establish notability. -- Whpq (talk) 16:54, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.