Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Entercom Greensboro Tower


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. Can&#39;t sleep, clown will eat me 10:34, 21 December 2006 (UTC)

Entercom Greensboro Tower

 * — (View AfD)

This nomination completes the deletion of all stub articles of masts situated in the United states below 400m. Delete Ohconfucius 02:52, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, good riddance. Polecruft. -Amarkov blahedits 03:41, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete this towercruft. Edeans 04:04, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. MER-C 04:10, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Wikipedia declares war on non-notable masts... - WJBscribe (WJB talk) 06:10, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Non Notable mast.Coaster Kid 19:31, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete and salt every single non-notable tower/mast article on Wikipedia, including this article. I think it is the only way that this problem of non-notable masts will be resolved. I would also request a review of these mast articles with the WikiProject Architecture, WikiProject Television and WikiProject Radio. Wikipedia is not the MB21 transmission gallery of TV/Radio towers/masts. Any UK based mast information that isn't there should be given to the aforementioned website, and removed from Wikipedia. They won't grow beyond a stub and fail WP:NN miserably as well as WP:NOT and WP:NOT. --tgheretford (talk) 01:18, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge into list of masts. Just H 20:31, 20 December 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.