Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/EnterpriseAlumni


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus.  Sandstein  12:40, 27 November 2018 (UTC)

EnterpriseAlumni

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

There is no evidence of independent notability. Fails WP:CORPDEPTH and WP:NCORP; an advertorial piece on an unremarkable company. GSS (talk |c|em ) 11:29, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. GSS  (talk |c|em ) 11:29, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. GSS  (talk |c|em ) 11:29, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 12:21, 5 November 2018 (UTC)

User:GSS User:CAPTAIN RAJU

Notable company. Recommend to retain listing, company is founded by MBE recipient Emma Sinclair.

Their application was the first commercial partner app deployed on SAP Cloud Platform and they are becoming a leading research firm on Corporate Alumni / Alumnus

Company has created new market highlighted by Deloitte https://blog.bersin.com/why-former-workers-can-be-long-term-assets/

Please advise any adjustments you would like to see and any alternatives to deletions.

Ceisenmann (talk) 19:58, 5 November 2018 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, w umbolo   ^^^  13:24, 12 November 2018 (UTC)


 * Keep - Just about reaches notability based on the Telegraph article and Yahoo Finance reports. Not a fan of this content but what I like or don't like doesn't matter. FOARP (talk) 13:46, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
 * The Yahoo Finance is a press release which was originally published at prnewswire.com and the Telegraph piece does not establish notability and reads like an interview. GSS (talk |c|em ) 14:06, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Disagree. The Telegraph is an RS, and the coverage given to the company in the article just about rises to the level of "significant coverage". Like I said, I don't like stuff that reads like publicity (and it does) but there are always going to be borderline cases, and this appears to be one that just gets across into notability. FOARP (talk) 14:10, 12 November 2018 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jovanmilic97 (talk) 10:18, 19 November 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.