Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Enterprise coexistence


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was withdrawn by nominator. (non-admin closure).  " Pepper "  @ 07:00, 28 January 2017 (UTC)

Enterprise coexistence

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Seems to be at best a non-notable neologism or buzzword. Except for references to a specific product by this name by a company called BitTitan, I couldn't find any sources using "enterprise coexistence" as a set phrase. It's used in only two of the sources supplied by the author (including the several he said he added to show that it existed), one of which is a reference to the BitTitan product. Similarly "coexistence server" as mentioned in the article seems to be a specific product by Cognitive Networks, not a generic name for a type of server. Largoplazo (talk) 11:35, 27 January 2017 (UTC) Withdrawing nomination. I was hasty, and hadn't noticed that the author hadn't added only references, but also content elaborating on the variability of terms to refer to the same concept. My apologies. Largoplazo (talk) 11:41, 27 January 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.