Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Enterprise marketing management


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  MBisanz  talk 00:18, 29 April 2019 (UTC)

Enterprise marketing management

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Marketing WP:NEOLOGISM that the community seems to indicate it does not wish to accommodate. Article has no references which leads to WP:POV, WP:NOTESSAY and other concerns though that is not to say the sourcing is not fixable. Previously nominated in a bundle at Articles for deletion/Marketing operations management the other article was found to have a serious copy violation resulting in a CSD G12 and with this article also being mistakenly deleted in good faith got CSD G12 before being restored with suggestion to represent at AfD. Djm-leighpark (talk) 03:52, 3 April 2019 (UTC)

*Comment: Unfortunately Talk:Enterprise marketing management has not been restored at this time, hopefully this will be done soon. Thankyou.Djm-leighpark (talk) 07:27, 3 April 2019 (UTC) .. now restored.Djm-leighpark (talk) 08:58, 3 April 2019 (UTC)


 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Djm-leighpark (talk) 09:25, 3 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Djm-leighpark (talk) 09:25, 3 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Djm-leighpark (talk) 09:25, 3 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions. Djm-leighpark (talk) 09:25, 3 April 2019 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Comment I added three sources, including two books devoted to EMM. The subject is looking notable so far. From what I have read, it would seem reasonable to fold in verifiable information on the related MRM and MOM topics into this article. -- 17:20, 4 April 2019 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 06:10, 11 April 2019 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Comment: The related article nomination Marketing operations management with which this was previously bundled at AfD has now returned to AfD following DRV. Attempting to re-bundle at this stage may be undesirable however I would expect arguments to be synchronous.  Thankyou. Djm-leighpark (talk) 08:50, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep per the sources I added to the article. The topic looks notable and with two books devoted to the topic, a reasonable article can be written on this topic. -- 17:29, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete This is exactly the same topic as Marketing., at least ifit means what the article says.  Textbooks use buzzwords. The English language one relied on here is actually devoted to one particular theory of management, and if it is notable, would need a more appropriate name than the one chose by the publisher's editorial staff--it is furthermore considerably more specific than the totally vague article here, . The German one seems to just use it as a synonym, based on the publisher's  description. . If the term were to  have any distinctive meaning, it is not what is given in the article, --Enterprise as a prefix, usually means appropriate for a very large company ,as in Enterprise software. But this is no different from any other kind of marketing. WP is an encyclopedia, and we write articles on concepts, not jargon.   DGG ( talk ) 01:13, 13 April 2019 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Randykitty (talk) 14:53, 18 April 2019 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 05:52, 26 April 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.