Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Entertain-Dome 2


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 00:13, 28 February 2006 (UTC)

Entertain-Dome
This is the second time that this webcomic has been nominated for deletion. The first time can be found at Articles for deletion/Entertain-Dome. Reading the arguments in the original nomination, we see the argument for keep being based on the defunct WP:COMIC "alternate proposals" and was purely judged by the fact that it had over 100 strips. It's current Alexa rank is 3 million, although a sister site nominated below has a rank of around 550,000. Google search only brings up 166 links. Like the previous nomination, I just don't think this site is any more notable than the other swathes of websites out there. - Hahnchen 00:02, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Non notable. -- Jay  (Reply)  01:38, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete as repost. Sorry, misread the nom. savidan(talk) (e@) 02:47, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
 * This isn't a repost - it's a relisting on AFD; the previous AFD concluded in a keep. Zetawoof 07:28, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, no references to reputable sources, I haven't been able to find any, does not appear to meet WP:WEB notability guidelines. -- Dragonfiend 03:24, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Nacon kantari   e |t||c|m 04:54, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete nn. psch  e  mp  |  talk  07:03, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep and expand. The potential in this article for expansion is there. -- S iva1979 Talk to me  09:19, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep per Siva. Dread Lord C y b e r S k u l l ✎☠ 14:01, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Non-notable and void of any encyclopedic value --Mecanismo | Talk 17:19, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Non-notable. --Mindbender 22:09, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Webcruft. -AKMask 23:12, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete no 3rd-party verification. Ziggurat 06:15, 24 February 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.