Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Entex Adventure Vision

Entex Adventure Vision was proposed for deletion. This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was to keep. Cool Hand Luke  06:56, 6 Nov 2004 (UTC)

next to no content... needs to either be drastically overhauled or deleted Alkivar 04:04, 17 Oct 2004 (UTC)
 * Keep - Limited content should not equate to delete. Articles have to start somewhere. See Adventure Vision for lots of information. It is listed as a stub. It seems like that is the appropriate action until more contributions can be made. Hobie 05:10, 2004 Oct 17 (UTC)
 * I understand the way you feel since you wrote it... but come on, its not notable enough to deserve a dedicated page. I think this would probably be better merged into the Video game console listing. Alkivar 01:59, 19 Oct 2004 (UTC)


 * Unresolved/lost VfD. Keep. Article will hopefully be improved. Cool Hand Luke  03:00, 30 Oct 2004 (UTC)
 * weak Delete. 4 games released? Pretty obscure. --Improv 20:01, 30 Oct 2004 (UTC)
 * The page has been sitting there since September 12, why do we think anything more will be done to improve it? Delete.  RickK 00:40, Oct 31, 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete: no evidence of notability in sight. Wile E. Heresiarch 05:49, 31 Oct 2004 (UTC)
 * Keep, seems like there is potential to become encyclopedic, wikipedia ain't paper. &mdash; siro  &chi;  o  08:49, Oct 31, 2004 (UTC)
 * How long do we keep nonsense on the pretext that in some future date it will become useable? RickK 20:16, Nov 1, 2004 (UTC)
 * As long as it takes for them to be full articles, but I think you knew that. Google has plenty of hits. The system has some unique and interesting features: for example it used one vertical strip of 40 red LEDs and a spinning mirror to produce a screen with a 150 X 40 resolution. So article is a baby (2 months) - meh. It will improve just like all the other articles, but there is no reason to toss it out so early. FYI ht1848 = Hobie Ht1848 05:21, 2004 Nov 2 (UTC)


 * Keep. I used to own one of these. Still do, I think. Fantastic little system, though "hand-held" is pushing it. Ate batteries like no tomorrow and sometimes caused them to leak, which is why I think it didn't last longer. Hm, maybe I should fix this. Inky 02:53, 3 Nov 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete - so little content it doesn't even contain a complete sentence. -- Cyrius|&#9998; 05:06, 4 Nov 2004 (UTC)
 * I've filled it out a little bit and revised some of the information for better clarity. Inky 22:17, 4 Nov 2004 (UTC)
 * Better. Mild keep, article now has some actual content. It also appears that the Adventure Vision is some sort of freakishly rare collector's item. -- Cyrius|&#9998; 23:55, 4 Nov 2004 (UTC)
 * agreed definately better, however, i still dont feel its noteable enough for its own page considering it only had 4 games. for the same reason i feel the Nintendo Virtual Boy does not deserve its own article either, however these both appear notable for a unique feature (namely spinning mirrors using LED's to project the image), therefore should still be merged with Video game console per my post above. Alkivar 03:26, 5 Nov 2004 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.