Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Entrance Region in Pipe Flow


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Discussions about editorial concerns (trimming inappropriate content, merging content, and/or renaming) can take place on the article's talk page -- Ed (Edgar181) 17:18, 13 July 2014 (UTC)

Entrance Region in Pipe Flow

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Unsourced original research Jac 16888  Talk 18:39, 27 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:15, 27 June 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep. Article needs work certainly, and likely renaming, but this seems to be a well-documented phenomenon in fluid dynamics literature. Related to turbulence and laminar flow but I'm not an expert in this area. Tagging for expert attention. Ivanvector (talk) 20:23, 27 June 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep The dynamics of pipe flow is a well-studied phenomenon in fluid dynamics and hydraulics; this article is about the transition region as fluid enters a pipe. The idea of a transition region and the associated entrance length are well known in the field, being covered in textbooks and sites like BrightHub. The article is well-written, but could use better sourcing. We might consider renaming the article to Entrance length, which is often the main quantity of interest in the transition to fully developed flow. We already have an article on the related thermal entrance length, but this article is about the hydrodynamic aspect. --Mark viking (talk) 20:35, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 19:54, 6 July 2014 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.