Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Entrapped Book


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. WP:SNOW The Bushranger One ping only 02:18, 28 October 2011 (UTC)

Entrapped Book

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Unremarkable book from an author with no article. No indications or claims of notability. MikeWazowski (talk) 06:03, 23 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete. Fails WP:NBOOK. If at some point it becomes more notable it can be re-added, but at this point in time there is nothing to suggest that it's notable or will soon be notable at this time. Tokyogirl79 (talk) 08:14, 23 October 2011 (UTC)tokyogirl79
 * Delete no evidence at all of notability. Sourced only to its publisher's website and blogspot. JamesBWatson (talk) 17:02, 23 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 22:37, 23 October 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom  Jimfbleak  -  talk to me?  14:27, 24 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete - Lacks sufficient WP:RS to satisfy WP:GNG or WP:NBOOK … self-published sources don't qualify. Happy Editing! &mdash;  17:26, 26 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete as barely disguised spam. Bearian (talk) 01:07, 27 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete, no evidence of notability offered and will soon be blocking author. Daniel Case (talk) 02:54, 27 October 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.