Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Entre Colunas


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was merge with Grande Loja Regular de Portugal.-- Kubigula (talk) 05:02, 1 December 2007 (UTC)

Entre Colunas

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

This is an article on a Portuguese-language Masonic magazine. I prodded it because there was no indication or assertion of notability. User:Carlos Botelho, who created the article and has his own article on WP (Carlos Botelho) listing him as the PR director for said Grand Lodge, removed the prod, changed nothing that would assert notability, and then made threats on the article talk page. All this aside, there are thousands of Masonic jurisdictions, and most of them have some sort of magazine. This does not make the magazines themselves notable. MSJapan (talk) 16:06, 22 November 2007 (UTC)

Well, as far as i have noticed i am so envolved as you are with some kind of different masonic interest, which violates the conflict of interest policy. Moreover, of course some words must no be taken too much seriously, and the stop sending magazines its just to say that theres a notable Grand Lodge who cares about England, isnt it. Any way you can delete another article regarding GLRP as you have done before with our grand-master and be proud of it. Congratulations....you win. This is the true spirit of some wikipedia. Fraternaly Carlos Botelho (talk) 21:42, 22 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Merge with Grande Loja Regular de Portugal (with peacock terms removed) and redirect. I can't see enough evidence to establish independent notability of the magazine, but the content of this article is relevant to the article on the grand lodge. Phil Bridger (talk) 12:33, 23 November 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.